Well, it’s a marvellous month for a World Cup

Week One has provided some excellent rugby, dodgy refereeing and unfortunate injuries.

I think we can all unite around Uruguay as WC champions.

Other competitions are also starting up, so cancel all engagements and be prepared to spend your entire weekend and parts of the midweek glued to the screen. Hopefully not literally.

For those of you who lack rugby preparation skills, let me remind you to order in adequate supplies of booze, fags and possibly food.

Exciting rugby on the telly this week

Friday 27th September

Cheetahs 48 – 14 Glasgow 18:05Premier Sports 2
Ulster 38 – 14 Ospreys 19:35Premier Sports 1
Leicester 27 – 7 Exeter 19:45BT Sport 2

Saturday 28th September

Argentina 28 – 12 Tonga 05:45ITV
Japan 19 – 12 Ireland 08:15 ITV
South Africa 57 – 3 Namibia 10:45ITV
Northampton 32 – 36 Wasps 15:00BT Sport 3
Munster 39 – 3 Drags 15:00Freesports / TG4
Southern Kings 27 – 31 Cardiff Blues 15:00Premier Sports 2
Scarlets 18 – 10 Connacht 17:15PS2 / S4C / TG4
Treviso 27 – 32 Leinster 17:15Premier Sports 1
Edinburgh 50 – 15 Zebre 19:35Premier Sports 2

Sunday 29th September

Georgia 33 – 7 Uruguay 06:15ITV
Australia 25 – 29 Wales 08:45ITV / S4C

Monday 30th September

Scotland 34 – 0 Samoa 11:15ITV

Wednesday 2nd October

France 33 – 9 USA 08:45ITV4
New Zealand 63 – 0 Canada 11:15 ITV4

Thursday 3rd October

Georgia 10 – 45 Fiji06:15ITV4
Ireland 35 – 0 Russia11:15ITV

1,654 thoughts on “Well, it’s a marvellous month for a World Cup

  1. expro2013's avatarexpro2013

    Cat

    France should be at least ‘meh’.

    There was some decent play there, and many of us thought they’d lose that game.

    ps. you missed Canada, who are ‘shit’.

    Like

  2. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    Cat – Yes. Which makes me feel very old.

    Like

  3. tichtheid's avatartichtheid

    I like that it’s called the Beam Me Up Scotty approach

    Like

  4. Cat's avatarCat

    @Dov

    Christ, me too. Thought it was- he looks like his old man.

    @Pro- see the thing is they were OK for half and then absolute raging dogshit for half. I need to see another match from them to put them up. At the moment, they’re very marginally shit- the most marginal of the lot of them.

    Like

  5. Cat's avatarCat

    And can’t believe I missed Canada. Sorry Dog.

    Like

  6. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    yeah. especially since France beat Argentina so cant really be shit when Argentina get a meh.

    Its like you haven’t put any serious thought into this Cat.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. Cat's avatarCat

    Think I’ve been rumbled.

    Like

  8. Cat's avatarCat

    France haven’t played their second match yet. Argentina have. Can’t reasonably promote them until they fist the USA like Fisto onna Fisting Rampage.

    Like

  9. NZ: Good
    SA: Good
    Italy: Good

    Group of Death!

    Liked by 1 person

  10. tichtheid's avatartichtheid

    There was another incident where Gordy Reid was carrying very close to the line, less than a metre out, the ball was kicked out of his hands, or not so much kicked as deliberately dislodged with. Samoan foot, that could have been another penalty try, but it’s difficult to say without seeing it again

    Like

  11. Borderboy's avatarBorderboy

    Ticht – Richard Thompson will 70 (!) soon, and is doing a concert at the Royal Albert Hall. Nice interview below:

    https://www.theguardian.com/music/2019/sep/30/richard-thompson-at-70-on-love-loss-and-being-a-muslim-in-trump-us

    Liked by 1 person

  12. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    How come Italy get ‘good’ for thrashing 2 minnows and England only get ‘meh’ for doing the same?

    Not that I’m taking this at all seriously.

    Like

  13. Cat's avatarCat

    Cos we should expect more from England. Anyway, when NZ stick 80 points on Italy, I’ll drop them straight to shit.

    What do you mean you’re not taking it seriously. That took me literally seconds.

    Like

  14. Borderboy's avatarBorderboy

    That long?

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Cat – if we are thinking about it :

    Wales – winners

    The rest – losers

    That’s how it will be.

    Like

  16. That took me minutes.

    Like

  17. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    What more could we have expected from England? We duffed up 2 terrible teams without breaking sweat.

    Don’t get me wrong, we’re losing to one of France or Argentina and going out in the quarters to Wales but we should be ‘good’ for now at least.

    Like

  18. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    Wales did look good yesterday.

    Australia looked good as well for a half

    Don’t fancy either in the quarters.

    Like

  19. Dab's avatarDab

    @Ticht – I do see your point, but isn’t the condition for a penalty try that a probable try has been prevented by an offence? In this case, yes there was an offence, but it (in my opinion, and this is very debatable) the offence was not what caused Maitland to lose the ball. Therefore the penalty try is not merited.

    Like

  20. Dov – really? We’ve digged both those teams recently without breaking a sweat too. I hope this doesn’t jinx us. I’m saving the jinxing for someone else. Obviously who that is is a secret.

    Like

  21. The All Blacks won’t put eightily on Italy, because they’re gonna try to lose so the Boks don’t go through. It’s their only chance of winning the whole thing. Except of course Ireland will stuff them up their holes in the QF when they rush Rettallick back too soon and he’s further off the pace than a Prius in an F1 race and a ref finally has the guts to ping Joe Moody for his illegal scrumming at every scrum.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Well I’m jinxing the Boks on my own, so you’ll have to find someone else Craigs. #RUMBLED!

    Like

  23. Dan,

    He clearly had the ball under control and was sliding towards the line until he was hit. I don’t think it was an unreasonable inference that the hit caused the fumble.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Deebs – sorry, the boks don’t need jinxing.

    Like

  25. Cat's avatarCat

    The person that complained about Naga Munchetty and the racism thing needs to have a good long look at themselves in the mirror. They complained TWICE- and the second has this in it:

    I would like my complaint to be investigated again and a more honest reply sent please. If you are content for your supposedly impartial presenters to make biased political statements, just say so. If you are not, then my complaint should be upheld and words of advice given.

    The BBC should have told him to sling his hook.

    Like

  26. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    Our recent record against Wales isn’t all that. Australia will be tougher at a world cup. I don’t fancy our chances at all on neutral territory,

    Like

  27. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    cat – that whole episode is just fucking stupid from the BBC.

    Load of total bollocks.

    Bag of wank.

    Pile of toss.

    That is to say, I’m generally not in agreement with their actions,

    Like

  28. Cat's avatarCat

    @Dov- and I don’t think we’ve lost to Australia in ages. I think it might be 2015 was the last one. Well overdue.

    Like

  29. Cat's avatarCat

    @Dov- I saw the whole interview, and how she can possibly be in trouble for saying that, as a BAME woman, racist words and phrases are racist is absolutely absurd.

    Like

  30. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    yes. Absurd as well.

    My descriptions were better though.

    Like

  31. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    But Oz have a big victory over the ABs on their recent record. We’ve got chuckiung away massive leads over Scotland and a couple of defeats to Wales.

    Worry worry worry.

    Like

  32. I’ve barely been following this but isn’t the accusation that she shouldn’t be seen to be biased. Even though she is entitled to her opinion.

    It’s a way to get at her and I think it’s racially motivated. Or just a way to pwn the libs. But it’s also a silly mistake to make no?

    Like

  33. Cat's avatarCat

    The whole thing is stupid. She was asked, specifically, as a minority woman what those phrases mean to her. She answered. The fact that it is stunningly obvious what those phrases means to anyone, regardless of pigmentation, is not the point. Saying that telling someone to “go back where they came from” is racist is such an overwhelmingly simple and clearly correct answer that it’s massively unjust to punish her for it.

    Like

  34. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    I don’t know how she could have been impartial.

    Trump uses racist language but remember the alternative facts, type of thing?

    ‘sbollocks.

    Like

  35. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    Maybe she could have blamed herself for taking offence and offered the counter point that Trump might just be a bit misunderstood?

    Like

  36. tichtheid's avatartichtheid

    “I do see your point, but isn’t the condition for a penalty try that a probable try has been prevented by an offence? In this case, yes there was an offence, but it (in my opinion, and this is very debatable) the offence was not what caused Maitland to lose the ball. Therefore the penalty try is not merited.”

    Dab, at the risk of labouring this, it isn’t “my” point, it’s the guidelines in the laws. The “Beam me up Scotty” guidelines mean that you take the Samoan winger off the pitch, he doesn’t exist, so there is no one there to tackle Maitland, no need for the dive short of the line and therefor a try would definitely have been scored. Whether we agree with those guidelines or not is not really relevant here.

    However, Maitland clearly had control of the ball until the winger slid into him, it was dislodged after contact, we could argue whether or not the contact caused the loss of possession, but one thing did happen after the other

    Like

  37. Cat's avatarCat

    @Dov- as soon as wosshisname asked her about her personal reaction to the actual words used she was in trouble. I have no idea how she could’ve got out of it. To be honest, I also don’t see why she should have to get out of it, either, and don’t even think that what she said showed political bias.

    Like

  38. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    do we beam him up from the point he offends or retrospectively for the entire passage of play?

    If its the first play of the game and he gets a red he’s effectively never taken the pitch. Maybe gets no cap and can be replaced?

    Like

  39. Probably could have said that she couldn’t give an opinion as a BBC journo.

    But that would mean non white employees being forced to swallow this sort of thing. There probably needs to be a change in the guidelines tbh.

    Like

  40. Cat's avatarCat

    There is a lot of Aussie whinging BTL on the Match report for the Wales loss

    Like

  41. Maybe a caveat could allow journos to give opinions on all things. I. E. ‘me personally’. This should be in the guidelines so that it’s clear the BBC has no opinion but the journo does.

    Like

  42. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    ref blaming?

    Like

  43. OurTerry's avatarOurTerry

    If BBC employees aren’t meant to offer opinions then BBC Breakfast needs to scrap that excruciating light hearted chat they do between news pieces. It’s arse clenchingly awful.

    Like

  44. tichtheid's avatartichtheid

    Cheers for the link, BB.

    It’s a bit weird to think of RT as 70, he’s always been “about 40” in my head, even when he was younger than that

    Like

  45. Cat's avatarCat

    @Craigs- she said specifically that she was commenting “as a black woman”. I have no idea how she could have been more explicit.

    Like

  46. Cat's avatarCat

    Also, there was ONE fucking complaint. I mean, really, ffs. One sad sack with too much time on his hands (blatantly his), complained. Out of millions.

    Like

  47. tichtheid's avatartichtheid

    Cat, the complaint just sounds like a “what about the white male Christian straight pride?” thing

    Like

  48. Cat's avatarCat

    I took it as more standard BLAH INSTITUTIONAL BIAS BLAH BLAH BLAH crap, but you may well be right. He sounds like a right prick, you can be sure of that. I half wondered if it was Father of Cat, but then decided that I wasn’t being charitable.

    Like

Comments are closed.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started