Well, it’s a marvellous month for a World Cup

Week One has provided some excellent rugby, dodgy refereeing and unfortunate injuries.

I think we can all unite around Uruguay as WC champions.

Other competitions are also starting up, so cancel all engagements and be prepared to spend your entire weekend and parts of the midweek glued to the screen. Hopefully not literally.

For those of you who lack rugby preparation skills, let me remind you to order in adequate supplies of booze, fags and possibly food.

Exciting rugby on the telly this week

Friday 27th September

Cheetahs 48 – 14 Glasgow 18:05Premier Sports 2
Ulster 38 – 14 Ospreys 19:35Premier Sports 1
Leicester 27 – 7 Exeter 19:45BT Sport 2

Saturday 28th September

Argentina 28 – 12 Tonga 05:45ITV
Japan 19 – 12 Ireland 08:15 ITV
South Africa 57 – 3 Namibia 10:45ITV
Northampton 32 – 36 Wasps 15:00BT Sport 3
Munster 39 – 3 Drags 15:00Freesports / TG4
Southern Kings 27 – 31 Cardiff Blues 15:00Premier Sports 2
Scarlets 18 – 10 Connacht 17:15PS2 / S4C / TG4
Treviso 27 – 32 Leinster 17:15Premier Sports 1
Edinburgh 50 – 15 Zebre 19:35Premier Sports 2

Sunday 29th September

Georgia 33 – 7 Uruguay 06:15ITV
Australia 25 – 29 Wales 08:45ITV / S4C

Monday 30th September

Scotland 34 – 0 Samoa 11:15ITV

Wednesday 2nd October

France 33 – 9 USA 08:45ITV4
New Zealand 63 – 0 Canada 11:15 ITV4

Thursday 3rd October

Georgia 10 – 45 Fiji06:15ITV4
Ireland 35 – 0 Russia11:15ITV

1,654 thoughts on “Well, it’s a marvellous month for a World Cup

  1. OurTerry's avatarOurTerry

    Last 2 minutes have been all Canada

    Like

  2. slademightbe#42again's avatarsladeis#42

    ….but the sponsorship money is probably a nice wedge…………..

    Like

  3. slademightbe#42again's avatarsladeis#42

    OT…
    ….thanks for the SMMT link

    Like

  4. slademightbe#42again's avatarsladeis#42

    63?……………………”pfffft” as a llama might say

    Like

  5. yosoy's avataryosoy

    Worst watch of the cup, genuinely felt pointless. Poor old Canada.

    Like

  6. EnzoM's avatarEnzoM

    That was a real throwback. Only one of those I’ve caught this World Cup (albeit didn’t see Boks-Namibia).

    Still, only having one so far is probably a major improvement on all WCs since 1995.

    Like

  7. slademightbe#42again's avatarsladeis#42

    I think it gets tougher for the lower teams as the Tourni progresses – so relative performance of top teams against minnows is hard to judge.

    Like

  8. I’d agree Slade, the first game or two they’ve got full squads and relatively few bumps and bruises. The last couple of pool games test the depth far more, especially if smaller teams have had quick turnarounds between matches.

    Like

  9. OurTerry's avatarOurTerry

    Peter Sissons RIP

    Like

  10. ‘As his job approval rating slides to an all-time low, reports emerge that the president suggested shooting migrants in the legs, building a snake and alligator-filled moat at the US-Mexico border (no, really) and electrifying his much-touted wall before being told by aides his ideas were both illegal and impractical.’

    Illegal and impractical? Bunch of killjoys

    Like

  11. Chimpie's avatarChimpie

    Should have gone for a shark moat.

    Like

  12. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    sharks with laser beams

    Like

  13. On their heads.

    Like

  14. All Sag wanted was sharks with fricking laser beams on their heads.

    Like

  15. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    Boks – Namibia was similar.

    England – USA wasn’t that far off.

    Ireland did quite well to stay in the game against Japan ….

    It’s been quite competitive overall I think.

    Liked by 2 people

  16. So, having watched that, I think France stay in the “shit” bracket.

    Watch them do England now.

    Like

  17. dovahkin79's avatardovahkin79

    Cat – you not even bothering with a full update?

    Like

  18. Cat – Alfred spirals quite quickly doesn’t he?

    Like

  19. Chimpie, this is one of my favourite reactions to when Trump announced the wall:

    Like

  20. @Craigs. He does. He’s got a lot of pent up rage that boy. Go back to where you first met him for the end of the story.

    It’s a complete waste of time. Annalise is immortal and you can make her whole again.

    You killed Ebby? If so take Annalise’s remains to the altar in Space Slug’s lair. Annalise is only for PvP though, so it’s up to you whether to bother.

    You can also ask Annalise to marry you. She keeps turning me down though. Possibly cos I use a female hunter.

    Alfred is quite a tragic side quest. Not up to the level of Gazza’s Daughter or Granny crack dealer (or even the hooker- but you offed her)

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Will come back to Ebrietas, she keeps killing me easily. Need to replay so I can do Eileen’s quest properly. And Arianna.

    Like

  22. Having looked up Arianna’s quest, I’m not that bothered.

    Like

  23. expro2013's avatarexpro2013

    My thoughts on the USA game.

    1) The US defensive line is working well. With the exception of Fickou spotting a mismatch close to the line, France either scored from kicking over or around it, or from a maul.

    2) Joe Taufeete’e is one of the most powerful ball carriers in the tournament. Him hitting the line at full tilt is splendid to see.

    3) We should have scored when we were camped on their line. They should have had a player in the bin too. (How many final warnings can you get?) If we had scored then, and taken the lead, we might have been able to kick on against a rattled French team.

    4) Not sure what Blaine Scully really brings at the moment apart from leadership and tackling.

    5) Shaun Davies should not be the guy catching contestable high kicks. He’s tiny. Cam Dolan might be better dropping back, a la Sergio / Read.

    6) Big improvement from the pack after the England debacle. France would have fancied mullering the US pack yet only exerted dominance towards the end. The States harassed them at the breakdown splendidly.

    Like

  24. falteringfullback's avatarfalteringfullback

    Pro – thought US were so much better across the board.

    Ref’s unlimited final warnings (there might be something to this two tier reffing thing) certainly didn’t help but I think biggest issue for US was kicking away promising possession that just ended up in a mark being called. Happened a couple of times that I can recall when they were around the French 10m line…either need to play more phases or kick low/into touch.

    Like

  25. @pro, i was flitting in and out but it looked a decent effort from the US. The chunks I saw the forwards looked pretty evenly matched. Your 15 seemed a bit lost positionally and when defending in general. Was he playing out of position?

    Like

  26. I also thought the replacement 9 was a step up, better kicks and nice heads-up decisions. Just impressions though.

    Like

  27. expro2013's avatarexpro2013

    @IKS

    He’s a utility back who usually plays as a wing, plays FB in the MLR and has even played 9.

    @FF

    The Tier Two reffing thing is definitely a thing.

    Did you notice Picamoles leads with his forearm out in front of him on every carry?

    Like

  28. Re leading with the forearm, is it always a penalty or only if it hits the tackler in the neck or head?

    Like

  29. expro2013's avatarexpro2013

    @Craigsman

    at the moment it is only illegal if the tackler is hurt and/or if a either referees assistant, home crowd or TV director spot it.

    Like

  30. yosoy's avataryosoy

    It’s never [rarely] a penalty, which is the real issue. Along with many other things that DBWR have let slide over the years. If the refereeing has, at times, seemed hysterical in this cup, it’s only because referees are learning to adapt to any change in directives as much as the players are.

    Why DBWR haven’t implemented these changes long before their showpiece shindig should be questioned. But won’t.

    Rugby has become infuriating to watch, which is a shame as the standard is ever improving.

    Liked by 2 people

  31. expro2013's avatarexpro2013

    @Yosoy

    Too right.

    It is something that is 1) illegal and 2) being coached to players

    Like

  32. thaumaturge's avatarthaumaturge

    Here we go again with prorogation. Holy fuck.

    Like

  33. Is a ‘fend’ a hand-off? There’s a big difference between leading with your forearm/elbow and leading with your hand.

    Like

  34. tompirracas's avatartompirracas

    I’d say it was the same, Iksy.

    Was looking at some French rugby terminology earlier. I particularly liked “le raffut” for “hand off /fend” and “le cad-deb” for “sidestep”. Best of all is “le offload”.

    Like

  35. OurTerry's avatarOurTerry

    @tomp
    I’d be very interested to see if there is French cricket terminology. I wonder what they say for “third man”, “fine leg” and “dibbly-dobbler”.

    Like

  36. Borderboy's avatarBorderboy

    troisième homme
    bien jambe
    dibbler-dobbler

    Liked by 3 people

  37. Cheers pro/yos. I remember seeing a few hand offs to the neck which went unpunished and there was Keith Earls tackle on Savea where he took an elbow.

    There’s a few ways you can get injured in contact tbh, it’s difficult to deal with all of them. Coaching players to tackle low is one of them. But I think we have to accept a level of risk to players and maybe have an injury sub or something.

    Otherwise it’s left to human judgement within the laws and no one is ever completely happy with that.

    Like

  38. Cheers Pro/yos. There is so many ways to get injured in contact that I’m not sure if you can ref it totally fairly. We might need to accept a certain level of risk and coach players to tackle low. Maybe have an injury sub.

    The refs human judgment is always going to piss some people off.

    Like

  39. Ffs – for some reason I couldn’t see my first post and I thought I’d lost it. Oh well, double me.

    Like

  40. Toot de la fruit.

    Like

  41. tompirracas's avatartompirracas

    French cricket is mostly made played by expats so don’t know if they’d have much need for their own versions of the terminology. Same here in the Czech Republic.

    Like

  42. thaumaturge's avatarthaumaturge

    Troisième mec
    Jambe bien formée
    bof-bof (wtf is a dibbly-dobbler anyway?)

    Like

  43. yosoy's avataryosoy

    J’aime le offload et le throat smash aussi.

    Liked by 1 person

  44. thaumaturge's avatarthaumaturge

    Yos – I call bollocks on that. ‘Throat’ is practically unpronounceable for a French person. Except of course our Flair. ;-)

    Like

  45. Borderboy's avatarBorderboy

    třetí muž
    jemná noha
    dibbly-Dobbler

    I’m really disappointed no-one has a translation for dibbly-dobbler.

    No, wait. I have one! Latin – “Dobbler dibbly”

    Like

  46. thaumaturge's avatarthaumaturge

    BB – try Hindi or Urdu.

    Like

  47. expro2013's avatarexpro2013

    just seen all the NZ tries.

    In almost all of them Canada wing Jeff Hassler is desperately chasing the scorer to the line. He’s in every shot, arriving seconds after the try scorer with his glorious mane of hair.

    He’s a big lad and with all that fruitless chasing he must have covered a serious amount of distance today. For nowt.

    Like

  48. tompirracas's avatartompirracas

    BB, třetí muž is the film rather than the fielding position.

    Like

Comments are closed.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started