Cuppa Time

Turn off the phones, lock the kids in the soundproof basement, prepare your food and drink and turn on the telly, ‘cos it’s time for the European cups again.

Prognostication is not my forté, but I’ll give it a bash for the Big Cup matches.

Northampton v Racing 92

I was surprised to discover that Racing 92 are only in 8th position in the Top 14, whereas the Saints are sitting pretty in third place in the English Premiership. However, Racing know how to bring their best game to an important match, so I’m going for les Parisiens by 7.

Cardiff v Toulouse

Can’t see anything other than a Toulousain trouncing of the hosts by about 15 points.

Leinster v Bath

With Bath languishing at the bottom of the Premiership, this can only go one way. Blue Meanies by 40.

Bordeaux v Leicester

The two top teams in their respective leagues, again to my surprise. I’ll raise a glass of Haut-Médoc to the home side by 3.

Clermont Auvergne v Ulster

Having attended this fixture in a previous competition, ordinarily I’d say a safe win for the home side. However, TomPirracas’ sleuthing informs us that Clermont is a Covid-ravaged camp, so that and downright foolish optimism leads me to predict Ulster by a point.

Exeter v Montpellier

Another tough one to predict, so home advantage to provide a narrow win.

Ospreys v Sale

Ospreys must be exhausted after last week, but Sale are not doing very well this year. Ospreys by 7.

Connacht v Stade Français

Connacht are on good form, and have been unlucky to narrowly lose a couple of their matches so far. I have no similar insights on SF, but they are towards the bottom of the table. Connacht by 4.

La Rochelle v Glasgow

Two fifth-place sides competing. Hmm. Chez nous by 3.

Wasps v Munster

Given Munster’s very depleted squad, Wasps by 15. At least.

Onna telly this week

Friday 10th December

Northampton v Racing 9220:00BT Sport 2
Lyon v Gloucester20:00BT Sport 3

Saturday 11th December

Cardiff v Toulouse13:00Channel 4 / BT Sport 2
Leinster v Bath15:15BT Sport 2
Bordeaux v Leicester15:15BT Sport 3
Clermont v Ulster17:30BT Sport 2
USAP v Dragons17:30S4C
Exeter v Montpellier20:00BT Sport 2

Sunday 12th December

Ospreys v Sale13:00BT Sport 2
Connacht v Stade Français13:00BT Sport 3
La Rochelle v Glasgow15:15BT Sport 3
Wasps v Munster15:15BT Sport 2

788 thoughts on “Cuppa Time

  1. OurTerry's avatarOurTerry

    @thauma

    Well you certainly don’t want to be taking repeated doses of an mRNA medicine. This is an article on Moderna from around 2016 https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/13/moderna-therapeutics-biotech-mrna/

    Delivery — actually getting RNA into cells — has long bedeviled the whole field. On their own, RNA molecules have a hard time reaching their targets. They work better if they’re wrapped up in a delivery mechanism, such as nanoparticles made of lipids. But those nanoparticles can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years.

    Novartis abandoned the related realm of RNA interference over concerns about toxicity, as did Merck and Roche.

    That’s why they went into vaccines, as they assumed the patient would only need one dose. Repeated mandated doses over a long period? You’ll kill a lot of people.

    Like

  2. tompirracas's avatartompirracas

    “I mean requiring proof of vaccination to go anywhere or do anything outside your own property”

    You’d have guards outside everyone’s home to check their vaccination status?

    What happens if you’re not vaccinated and your landlord wants to kick you out because they want to sell the place? Can you say “You can’t kick me out cos I’m unvaccinated”?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. thaumaturge's avatarthaumaturge

    TomP – What I don’t understand is people who refuse to be vaccinated. The drink-driving analogy is not wrong here: I’ll just get rat-arsed and then get in the car and speed. If anything happens, I’ll only hurt myself.

    OT – how dangerous compared to catching Covid, particularly if you are vulnerable? Plus, I imagine the technology will improve rapidly. Plus I’m all right Jack, as only my booster was mRNA. ;-)

    Like

  4. Like

  5. OurTerry's avatarOurTerry

    Put it this way the nanolipid technology was being phased out as they have found no way of making it safe.

    Like

  6. Thaum – some people die from getting the vaccine without an underlying condition. So mandating them will kill a small amount of people. And that’s on the government. Yes unvaccinated people are more likely to die and harm others, but that’s on them. Trolley problem innit.

    Like

  7. Plus, I’m pro choice on all things going in and out of ones body.

    Like

  8. OT – the creeping power of the government scares me the most. Without wanting to sound overly conspiratorial. And Starmer supported it.

    Like

  9. Sorry that was meant for Tomp really.

    Like

  10. I also found out today that not wanting vaccine mandates makes me an anti vaxxer in some eyes.

    Like

  11. tompirracas's avatartompirracas

    Starmer was head of the DPP for however many years. He’s not interested in the state not accruing more powers for itself.

    Like

  12. tompirracas's avatartompirracas

    Some more NFT nonsense here: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-59638565

    Like

  13. thaumaturge's avatarthaumaturge

    Craigs

    Thaum – some people die from getting the vaccine without an underlying condition. So mandating them will kill a small amount of people.

    That’s a tiny number compared to those who will die of the virus with or without an underlying condition.

    I’ve always scored well into the left/libertarian part of the political chart, but not when you are putting other people’s health and lives at risk. People who don’t vaccinate or mask can just FRO and keep to their homes instead of forcing others to do so.

    Like

  14. Thaum – I agree that the numbers of people who die differs but if someone signs a mandate into law they are in effect performing an act that will kill those who are allergic to the vaccine. Which is pulling the lever in the trolley problem.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem

    Re putting others health at risk, I thought that having the vaccine didn’t reduce transmissibilty of the virus? I could be wrong there.

    Like

  15. thaumaturge's avatarthaumaturge

    Morning! As I understand it, the vaccine reduces both infectability and transmissibility (you can’t pass it on if you don’t have it, and your viral load will likely be lower).

    Like

  16. OurTerry's avatarOurTerry

    @thauma

    The vaccine reduces transmissibility for a bit and this wanes to zero after 3 months, hence the need for a booster (hence it isn’t technically a vaccine but a therapeutic). It appears to have no longer term benefit. Natural immunity from infection appears much stronger and likely to last a lifetime.

    Like

  17. Chimpie's avatarChimpie

    Craigs is anti vax? Who knew

    Like

  18. Chimpie's avatarChimpie

    I’ve no problem with covid restrictions from a government over reach POV,.

    I’m far more concerned about the various things going on in the background which aren’t getting the airtime at the moment, de-legitimisation of protests, Attempts to remove judicial oversight from government antics etc. etc.

    Liked by 3 people

  19. Thaum – also, if they can make you take a vaccine, what next?

    ‘They’ being the government.

    Like

  20. Chimpie is worried about The Great Reset. Who knew?

    Like

  21. Chimpie's avatarChimpie

    I should probably look up what the great reset is.

    Like

  22. Yeah, then you wouldn’t worry about it.

    Like

  23. Chimpie's avatarChimpie

    ‘Plus, I’m pro choice on all things going in and out of ones body.’

    Impressive body control. You can choose whether or not to poop or pee?

    Like

  24. Impressive body control

    This makes sense when I remember your culinary skills.

    Like

  25. Chimpie's avatarChimpie

    My culinary skillz are awesome

    Anyhoo this great reset business doesn’t sound too worrying. Could be positive. Not sure what it has to do with with this current government suppressing free expression and giving themselves cover for their corruption.

    Like

  26. Chimpie- the Great Reset is a conspiracy amongst the extreme anti woke.

    Like

  27. Chimpie's avatarChimpie

    Must be a different great reset than the one I just looked up. ’twas all about a more sustainable recovery from covid.

    Like

  28. Chimpie's avatarChimpie

    Been updating myself on the yesterday’s vote & debate. That Des Swayne is quite something, marvellously detached from reality. Incredible stuff he comes out with.

    Like

  29. ClydeMillarWynant's avatarClydeMillarWynant

    “On 22 November 1986, as a prospective parliamentary candidate for a South Wales constituency, he was quoted in the Western Mail saying that “the surest way to protect the public from AIDS is to outlaw homosexuality and lock up offenders”. From 1987 to 1997, he was a computer systems manager at Royal Bank of Scotland.”

    Like

  30. ClydeMillarWynant's avatarClydeMillarWynant

    So that’s at least 35 years of half-witted bigotry which apparently gets you a knighthood. Have to congratulate the people of New Forest West for electing him seven times.

    Like

  31. ClydeMillarWynant's avatarClydeMillarWynant

    In the same period the good folk of New Forest East have elected Julian Lewis seven times. He seems to be less thick, but probably more dangerous. He’s one of ours (Swansea ), we throw up more of these pillocks than sometimes meets the eye as we don’t generally vote for them ourselves. Swayne seems to be possibly a bit posh Scot? Hard to find out for sure. Not sure the New Forest is somewhere I’d like to live.

    Like

  32. Chimpie – it is that thing but the conspiracy theory attached is thus:

    The Great Reset conspiracy theory suggests that some world leaders planned and executed the COVID-19 pandemic in order to take control of the world economy.

    Like

  33. thaumaturge's avatarthaumaturge

    OT – seem to remember reading that you got better protection from a jab than natural immunity for Alpha, but the other way around for Delta. So who knows with Omicron? You certainly don’t seem to get long-term immunity from either.

    Like

  34. Chimpie's avatarChimpie

    @craigs

    Well obviously. Latest stage of the lizard people taking over. Or bill gates or something. All perfectly logical

    Like

  35. tompirracas's avatartompirracas

    A 21st Century New World Order if you like, craigs.

    Like

  36. OurTerry's avatarOurTerry

    @thauma

    And you may have identified the real purpose of the global vaccination programme. Why do we continue to encourage non-vulnerable people to get non-neutralising vaccines? If it was about immunity why don’t we give people immunity tests and focus the vaccine on people who aren’t immune? The idea of vaccine escape (strains of the virus surviving that are increasingly resistant to non-neutralising vaccines – identical mechanism to antibiotic resistant bacteria) is well understood and indeed was predicted to happen with covid. And it’s quite clear that the emergence of delta, and then omicron, is actually driven by that global vaccination programme. Both delta and omicron may be more transmissible but all indications are that they are milder than their recent ancestors. To repeat – if we put the non-neutralising vaccine into lots of people when the target virus is circulating you massively increase the probability of vaccine escape.

    So is this recent booster drive more about driving the next variant after omicron (which should be called pi) that should be milder still?

    Like

  37. tichtheid2's avatartichtheid2

    There’s an interesting article here about mRNA vaccines

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w

    Liked by 1 person

  38. tompirracas's avatartompirracas

    CMW, Lewis was a mucker of Norris McWhirter at the Freedom Association and connected to Robert Moss, Brian Crozier and that type. Very murky past of infiltration and anti-Wilson and later anti-left wing activities.

    The New Forest is very pleasant.

    Like

  39. ClydeMillarWynant's avatarClydeMillarWynant

    I’m sure the New Forest is very pleasant, but it’s hard not to have suspicions about the prevailing attitudes of the people there. I have to go to Hereford quite often and the countryside that’s in easy reach is wonderful (OK, the best stuff’s over the border, but it’s not far), but I wouldn’t live there either for this reason.

    Like

  40. OT – so, should I get the booster? And can I take your advice as medical advice in a future court?

    Like

  41. Chimpie's avatarChimpie

    Yes you should, criags as long as you don’t mind being implanted with a Gates microchip and contributing to the great reset.

    Liked by 1 person

  42. OT – also, will the virus be affected by the anti viral treatments coming available? Horse paste and other things.

    Like

  43. tichtheid2's avatartichtheid2

    My wifi is brilliant now.

    Liked by 3 people

  44. And horse piss.

    Like

  45. tichtheid2's avatartichtheid2

    Saracens have conceded their game against Pau due to Corona cases so 28-0 to Pau.

    No news from Edinburgh as yet but hopefully there won’t be infections from Saturday’s game, Montpellier are reporting infections, but as yet nothing from their opponents from Saturday, Exeter.

    Exeter are at Glasgow this weekend.

    Like

  46. OurTerry's avatarOurTerry

    @craigs

    should I get the booster? And can I take your advice as medical advice in a future court?

    Your body, your choice.

    If you do have any adverse effects then unfortunately Pfizer, Moderna and AZ have all been granted indemnity so it’s unlikely you’ll be able to get them to court.

    Like

  47. ClydeMillarWynant's avatarClydeMillarWynant

    “And horse piss.”

    Sounds more auspicious than the paste.

    Like

Comments are closed.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started